Dales tiempo para pensar, y de form

Dales tiempo para pensar, y de forma interrumpida, mirando al espectador de la derecha,

dile: “O si quieres, tú mejor, coge la baraja y llévatela debajo de la mesa, y coge un grupito pequeño de arriba, cuéntalo y quédate con ese número de cartas, formando así un

valor. Una vez hecho, sigues diciéndole, pierde ese grupo de cartas entre las demás, y

deja nuevamente la baraja sobre la mesa”. Argumenta que esta es una forma muy casual

de elegir un número .

Mirando ahora al espectador de la izquierda, dile: “Yo sé que está pensando en Picas o

Corazones...”. Cuando el espectador te ha contestado, argumenta: “...bueno, o tréboles

o diamantes, porque ahora como él está pensando un número, puedes estar pensando

en cualquiera de los cuatro palos.”.

Aquí habrá sucedido varias cosas. Primero, que el espectador ha entendido que cualquiera de los cuatro valores podría valer. Pero lo habrá entendido tarde, cuando ya te ha

contestado a tu pregunta, de si su palo era de Picas o corazones, lo que le impedirá cambiar, pese a sentir ahora que cualquier de los cuatro palos podría valor.

Y por otro lado, como al comienzo el espectador estaba pensando un palo de color rojo

y nosotros le hemos preguntado Picas o Corazones, si este nos ha respondido que sí, es

que está pensando en Corazones, de habernos respondido que no, es que está pensando

en Diamantes. No te preocupes sea cual sea la respuesta del espectador, ya que quedará

obnubilada, cuando anuncies que también podría ser de tréboles y diamantes.

Esta es una bonita pesca que usa la ambigüedad como trampa principal. Una simple respuesta por parte del espectador, no dirá nada a nadie, a excepción de al mago, que dará

toda la información necesaria para saber el palo que está pensando el espectador.

Y realmente, ya está todo hecho:

Cogeremos la baraja para sacar y dejar sobre la mesa la carta elegida por ambos espec22

tadores. Pero, ¿Cómo sabemos el valor que está pensando el segundo espectador? Fácil:

Nuestra carta guía estaba la número doce. Al coger la baraja para buscar y dejar la carta

sobre la mesa, veremos qué posición ocupa ahora la guía, y restaremos a doce esta posición. Así, si la guía está ahora en la posición cinco, querrá decir que el espectador está

pensando en el número 7. Así pues, ya tenemos el valor de un espectador y el palo de

otro. Solo tendremos que buscar el siete de Corazones (en el ejemplo expuesto), dejarlo

sobre la mesa, y pedirle a un espectador que nombre el valor que está pensando, y al

otro el palo, girando a continuación la carta y mostrando así el milagro.

Personalmente me gusta mucho este método, ya que comienza sin ordenes de baraja,

con mezclas, con ausencia de cartas hasta el final, y logra una muy buena sensación de

valores pensados, tanto el palo como el número de la carta.

結果 (英文) 1:

Give them time to think, and as interrupted, looking at the viewer's right,say: "or if you like, you better, pick up the deck and take you under the table, and takes a small group of top, count it and stay with that number of letters, thus forming a"value. Once done, you are still saying, lost that group of letters between others, andleave again the cards on the table". He argues that this is a very casual wayChoose a number.Now facing the viewer's left, saying: "I know that you are thinking of Spades or"Hearts... "." When the viewer you have answered, argues: "... well, or clubs"or diamonds, because now as he is thinking of a number, you can be thinkingin any of the four suits. "."Here several things have happened. First, the viewer has understood that any of the four could be worth. But there will be understood later, when you haveanswered your question, if his stick was of Spades or hearts, which will prevent him to change, despite feeling now that any of the four clubs could value.And on the other hand, as to the start the viewer was thinking a red stickand we've asked Spades or hearts, if this has responded that Yes, it isthat you're thinking about hearts, have responded, is that you're thinkingin diamonds. Don't worry regardless of the response of the audience, since it will beobsessed, when you advertise that it could also be from clubs and diamonds.This is a nice fishing that uses ambiguity as main trap. A simple response from the Viewer, will not say anything to anyone, with the exception of the wizard, which willall the information necessary to know the stick that is thinking of the Viewer.And really, that's all done:We'll take the deck out and leave on the table the letter, chosen by both espec22scheduling. But, how do we know the value that is thinking the second Viewer? Easy:Our guide was the number twelve. To take the deck to search and leave the letteron the table, we will see which position is now the Guide, and will subtract twelve this position. Thus, if the guide is now in five position, mean that the Viewer isthinking about the number 7. So, already have the value of a viewer and the stick ofanother. We will only have to find the seven of hearts (in the exposed example), leton the table, and ask a spectator to name the value you are thinking, and to theother the bat, then turning the Charter and thus showing the miracle.Personally this method, I really like that it starts without orders from deck,with blends, with absence of letters until the end, and achieved a very good sense ofdesigned values, both the stick and the number of the Charter.

結果 (英文) 2:

Give them time to think, and uninterruptedly, looking at viewer on the right,

say, "Or if you want, you better take the deck and take her under the table, and gets a little above small group, count it and stick with that number of cards, thus forming a

value. Once done, you're saying, you lose that group of letters among others, and

again left the deck on the table ". He argues that this is a very casual way

to choose a number.

Looking now to the viewer on the left, say, "I know you are thinking of Spades or

Hearts ...". When the viewer has answered you, argues: "... well, or clubs

or diamonds, because now he is thinking like a number, you may be thinking

in any of the four suits.".

Here are several things have happened. First, the viewer has understood that any of the four values ​​might be. But it will be understood later, when already you

answered your question, whether his stick was spades or hearts, which will prevent change, despite feeling now that any of the four suits could value.

On the other hand, as at the beginning the audience was thinking a stick red

and we have asked Spades or Hearts, if this has answered that yes, it

is thinking of Hearts had we said no, it is thinking

in Diamonds. Do not worry Whatever the viewer's response as it will be

clouded when you announce that may also be of clubs and diamonds.

This is a pretty fishing using ambiguity as the main trap. A simple response from the viewer, will not say anything to anyone, except for the magician, who will give

all the information necessary to know the club is thinking the viewer.

And really, it is all done:

We'll take the deck to remove and leave on the table the card chosen by both espec22

ters. But how do we know the value you are thinking the second viewer? Easy:

Our wine guide was the twelfth. Grasping the deck to search and leave the letter

on the table, we'll see what position now occupied by the guide, and subtract twelve this position. Thus, if the guide is now in position five will mean that the viewer is

thinking about the number 7. So, we have the value of a spectator and stick

another. Just we have to find the seven of hearts (in the example given), leave it

on the table, and ask a spectator to name the value you are thinking, and the

other the stick, then turning the letter and thus showing the miracle.

I personally really like this method because it starts without orders deck,

with mixtures, with no letters to the end, and achieves a very good feeling

designed values, both the stick and the number of the letter.

結果 (英文) 3:

Give them time to think, and interrupted Way, looking at the viewer"s right,Tell him, "or if you want, you better take the deck and get under the table, and take a small group of up, count it and stay with that number of cards, forming aValue. Once done, you keep telling loses this group of Letters, among others, andAgain let the cards on the table. " Argues that this is a very casualChoose a number.Looking now to the viewer"s left, say: "I know you"re Thinking in Spades orHearts... ". When the viewer has answered you, argues: "Well, or ClubsOr diamonds, because now he"s Thinking As a number, you may be thinkingIn any of the four suits.Several things have happened here. First, the audience has understood that any of the four values could be worth. But you will understand later, when you haveAnswered your question, if the stick was Spades or Hearts, what will change, but now feel that any of the four suits could value.On the other hand, as the viewer Thinking at the beginning was a red RosewoodAnd we have asked if the spades or Hearts, Yes, it isHe"s thinking about Hearts, we answered, no, you"re thinkingIn Diamonds. Don"t worry, whatever the viewer"s Response, which isClouded over, when you announce that could also be of Clubs and Diamonds.This is a nice Fishing that uses the Ambiguity as Main Trap. A simple response on the part of the viewer, not say anything to anyone, with the exception of the wizard, you willAll the information necessary to know the Stick that the spectator is thinking.And really, IT"s all done.Take the cards out on the table and leave the letter chosen by both espec22Exporters. But how do we know the value of the second Spectator is thinking? Easy:Our guide was Number 12. To take the cards to find the letter and leaveOn the table, now see what position the guide and Subtract Twelve this position. Thus, if the guide is now in the position Five, will mean that the viewer isThinking on the Number 7. Thus, we have the value of a spectator and stickAnother. We just have to find the seven of Hearts (in the above example), quitOn the table and ask a Spectator to name the value that is thinking, and theAnother Pole, then Turning the letter and showing the Miracle.Personally I Love This method since it begins without orders to DeckMixed, with no letters until the end, and achieves a very good feelingValues designed both the stick and the number of the letter.